<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: English Bay Light Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluemist.net/2010/03/was-it-art-or-a-waste-of-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluemist.net/2010/03/was-it-art-or-a-waste-of-money/</link>
	<description>Sunset Beach Webcam</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:37:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mango Kayak</title>
		<link>http://bluemist.net/2010/03/was-it-art-or-a-waste-of-money/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Mango Kayak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 07:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluemist.net/?p=101#comment-45</guid>
		<description>The Vancouver Museum (Planetarium) has crowned their building with glaring arc lamps.  Responsible builders are fighting light pollution with amber lighting and proper shielding. 
How can a publically subsidized facility be so insensitive?  
The amateur astronomers at the observatory next door can&#039;t be too impressed, and I am frankly furious.  The planetarium has helped people appreciate the night sky, but they have no right to replace it . . .
Please - if anyone out there has influence at City Hall or is a Vancouver Museum donor - ask them to reconsider this eyesore.  Perhaps they simply didn&#039;t think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Vancouver Museum (Planetarium) has crowned their building with glaring arc lamps.  Responsible builders are fighting light pollution with amber lighting and proper shielding.<br />
How can a publically subsidized facility be so insensitive?<br />
The amateur astronomers at the observatory next door can&#8217;t be too impressed, and I am frankly furious.  The planetarium has helped people appreciate the night sky, but they have no right to replace it . . .<br />
Please &#8211; if anyone out there has influence at City Hall or is a Vancouver Museum donor &#8211; ask them to reconsider this eyesore.  Perhaps they simply didn&#8217;t think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: close by guy</title>
		<link>http://bluemist.net/2010/03/was-it-art-or-a-waste-of-money/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>close by guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 17:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluemist.net/?p=101#comment-44</guid>
		<description>It was art! Popular too.... sometimes the wait was over 90mins to get a design in.

Plenty of people enjoyed taking pics... check flickr.

I&#039;m not sure what the cost was, so it would be hard to say if it was a waste of money. It had definitely had &quot;value&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was art! Popular too&#8230;. sometimes the wait was over 90mins to get a design in.</p>
<p>Plenty of people enjoyed taking pics&#8230; check flickr.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what the cost was, so it would be hard to say if it was a waste of money. It had definitely had &#8220;value&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Local Guy</title>
		<link>http://bluemist.net/2010/03/was-it-art-or-a-waste-of-money/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Local Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluemist.net/?p=101#comment-42</guid>
		<description>a waste of money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a waste of money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

